
I keep watching movies that I should have seen long ago because they are classic movies. 8 1/2, for instance, is mentioned so often that I felt bad that I hadn't seen it. It even figured in Almodovar's
Broken Embraces, the last movie I saw.
I can see why it is a classic and why it is mentioned so often. It is partly a surrealistic movie showing nonsensical bits of human life in a seemingly haphazard way. But it is partly a portrayal of a director who is considered a genius, but who is all the time afraid that people around him will figure out that he has no idea what the movie he's working on will be like.
However, the "ratings" I give to movies are not given by thinking about how "classic" or "important" or "fresh" the movie is or might have been as it was new. It is given purely on the basis of how much I liked the movie. Thus, the fact that I found the film terribly boring most of the time is far more important to me than the fact that it is considered a "must-see" by many people.
The movie, which is more than two hours long, was tiring, but that doesn't mean I regret seeing it. At least now I know what everybody is talking about...
8 1/2 (1963)
(See a register of all movies I've seen at
Collectorz.com.)